[ANSWER] NUR2102 Assessment 3: Written Assignment
Written Assignment NUR2102
TASK DESCRIPTION
Task overview
Assessment name | NUR2102 Written Assignment |
Brief task description | Apply the Clinical Reasoning Cycle to identify and describe how you would assess, intervene and evaluate care for the case study “Mr Noel Smith”. |
Rationale for assessment task. | This assessment will develop clinical reasoning skills and demonstrate the application of models of evidence-based care to work collaboratively with individuals with chronic conditions. It will develop theoretical concepts to assess, plan and intervene and evaluate care for people with a chronic condition. The assessment will develop graduates who are; well informed individuals with discipline-specific and industry knowledge relevant to their profession or area of study; critical, creative, thinkers who can integrate and apply knowledge and relevant skills, including research and digital literacy skills, to analyse and evaluate ideas, concepts, theories and problems, and offer insights, innovative approaches and solutions; ethical, engaged professionals and citizens who engage in non-discriminatory and sage practices and consider the local, global, social, economic legal and environmental influences on, and impact of, their attitudes and actions; and employable, enterprising professionals who are confident, self-directed, know how they learn, and are resourceful, resilient, and adaptable to change. |
Due Date | 23/10/20, 23:59 (AEST) |
Length | 1800 words +/-10% Word count includes in-text referencing and excludes the reference list |
Marks out of: Weighting: | Marks out of 100 Weighting 45% |
Course Objectives measured | CLO 1. Apply clinical reasoning skills and models of evidence-based care to work collaboratively with individuals with chronic conditions across the lifespan; CLO 2. Apply theoretical concepts in simulated practice to assess, plan and therapeutically intervene and evaluate care for people with various chronic conditions; |
GA 1. Well informed individuals with discipline-specific and industry knowledge relevant to their profession or area of study; GA 2. Critical, creative, thinkers who can integrate and apply knowledge and relevant skills, including research and digital literacy skills, to analyse and evaluate ideas, concepts, theories and problems, and offer insights, innovative approaches and solutions; GA 3. Ethical, engaged professionals and citizens who engage in non-discriminatory and sage practices and consider the local, global, social, economic legal and environmental influences on, and impact of, their attitudes and actions; GA 4. Employable, enterprising professionals who are confident, self-directed, know how they learn, and are resourceful, resilient, and adaptable to change. |
Task information
Task detail | Step 1: Review the elements of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (The Clinical Reasoning Cycle Lecture is located in Module 1 on the StudyDesk and the chapter from the textbook is located in the Assessment tab – Written Assignment Two). No submission of the Clinical reasoning Cycle is required. Step 2: Using the information provided in the patient situation and the current patient information and supported by the best available scholarly evidence apply the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in short answer format responding to the following questions: |
Case study
Short answer responses:
Note: You may use headings to differentiate the three parts of your response to the assignment questions
Consider the patient situation
Patient situation:
Mr Noel Smith a 55-year-old retired mining manager presents to the local Emergency Department with marked dyspnoea and audible wheeze increasing over the past 24 hours. He was diagnosed with asthma 20 years ago.
Mr Smith recently divorced from his wife of 15 years. While he used to be very active socially, he has withdrawn from family and friends since the divorce. He smokes 30 cigarettes a day, consumes 3-4 standard drinks daily and his diet is high in saturated fat and sodium. Mr Smith is independent with daily care and mobility however, he does not exercise routinely.
Mr Smith does not routinely visit his General Practitioner (GP). Over the past 5 years, his episodes of coughing and wheezing have increased. Mr Smith only takes his prescribed medications sporadically or when his symptoms worsen. He acknowledges that he once had an asthma action plan but admits that he does not understand it or has never had it reviewed by his GP. He does not feel that his diet or weight contributes to his asthma and states that exercise only makes him feel “puffed”.
Current patient information | ||
Objective Data | Past Medical History | Social & Family History |
Weight 95kgsHeight 176 cmBMI 30.7BP 155/95HR 110RR 32Sp02 92%Audible wheeze and decreased air entryProductive coughAccessory muscle useTalking in short sentences | HypercholesterolemiaHypertensionAsthma diagnosis at 35 years of ageObstructive Sleep Apnoea, does not like to use CPAP overnightGastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD)Seasonal hay feverReports being “wheezy” as a child and having recurrent chest infections Current Medications SalbutamolIpratropium BromideAtorvastatinAmlodipineEsomeprazole | Recently divorced from his wife of 15 yearsRetired mining managerSmokes 30 cigarettes a dayDrinks alcohol 3-4 standard drinks a dayIndependent with daily care and mobility Family history Father deceased-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Brother deceased -Myocardial InfarctionMother lives in aged care (82 years old) |
Subjective Data | ||
“My chest feels tight and it’s hard to breathe” “I get like this 3-4 times per year”“My puffer didn’t help but it could be out date” “I don’t have a current asthma action plan” |
Part A. Collect cues and recall knowledge (400 words)
Collect cues and Information
- From the provided patient situation and current patient information, identify the relevant patient cues/information and using best available scholarly evidence explain how these relate to asthma pathophysiology.
Process information
2. Analyse the subjective and objective data in the current patient information table and compare normal vs abnormal signs and symptoms. From this comparison provide an interpretation of his overall health status with support from the best available scholarly evidence.
Part B. Identify problems, establish goals, take action and evaluate outcomes (1000 words)
Identify problems and issues
Identify and discuss the acute and chronic problems/issues for Mr Noel Smith. Provide a rational for the identified problems based on the cues/information collected from Part A
Establish goals
From the chronic problems/ issues identified, outline ONE (1) SMART goal developed in collaboration with Mr Noel Smith.
Ensure all the elements: S (specific) M (measurable) A (achievable), R (realistic) T (timely) elements are incorporated. (Refer to Appendix A)
Take action
Identify relevant nursing interventions that will assist Mr Noel Smith in achieving the identified SMART goal. Using the best available scholarly evidence provide a rationale as to why these interventions are appropriate for Mr Smith.
Evaluate outcomes
Using best available scholarly evidence, describe the strategies you would use to evaluate the effectiveness of the nursing interventions you identified in Question 3.
Part C. Contemplate/reflect on new learning (400 words)
Reflect on process and new learning
Critically discuss the role of the nurse in facilitating self-efficacy and self-management for patients (and their families) living with a chronic condition in order to achieve improved health outcomes and quality of life. Use the best available scholarly evidence to support your discussion.
Writing Style
This assessment piece will be written in the form of academic short answers supported by scholarly evidence from peer reviewed resources.
- An introduction and conclusion are NOT required
- Write in full grammatical sentences
- Use correct spelling and punctuation
- Paragraph format is required. Dot/bullet points or numbered lists are not permitted
- Keep your writing formal and in third person.
- Express your ideas clearly and concisely
- Appropriately reference any information sources used.
Referencing/ citations
- For this assessment you will use either APA 6th or APA 7th referencing style.
- Sources: the majority of the references contained within your reference list must be no older than 6 years old.
- In text citations: You must include in text citations in the body of your work. Each new point or piece of evidence must be attributed (via in-text citation) to the source.
Formatting Style
Assignment must be presented as follows;
- Microsoft word document format
- Double Line Spacing with page numbers to be provided
- Times New Roman, 12-point font
- Use APA formatting style. The first line of each paragraph is indented. The reference list starts on a new page with the heading “References”
Resources available to complete task
- NUR2102 course modules, specifically 1, 2, 3 & 4
- Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Clinical Reasoning Cycle Module 1 on the StudyDesk and the Clinical Reasoning Cycle chapter located in the assessment tab-Written Assignment Two
- SMART Goals information (see information and examples in Appendix A)
- USQ academic writing style is provided in links on the course Resources Tab. https://www.usq.edu.au/library/study-support/assignments
- Referencing
- https://www.usq.edu.au/library/referencing
Submission information
What you need to submit | One Microsoft Word document that contains the following items: Your assignment document.No coversheet but footer must include: surname_initial_studentnumber_coursecode_A1_page no Please use the Written Assignment Marking Rubric to guide you, but do not submit the Marking Rubric. |
Submission requirements | This assessment is to be submitted electronically via the Written Assignment Submission link on the NUR2102 Study Desk. It must be submitted in electronic format as a Microsoft document via Turnitin. The Turnitin process may take up to 24 hours to produce a report. Therefore, allow adequate time to do this and address any issues of plagiarism detected by Turnitin before final submission. |
File Name Conventions | Save your document with the following naming conventions: surname_initial_studentnumber_coursecode_A3.doc e.g. Jones_S_001789789_NUR1202_A3.doc |
Moderation | This task will be moderated against the Written Assignment Criteria Marking Guide available on the Study Desk; All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare their marking before marks or grades are finalised. A rigorous moderation process is undertaken for this course; hence no remarking of assessment pieces will be considered. Final release of grades will normally be within three weeks of submission. This timeframe applies for any approvals for an extension of time commencing at the time of submission. |
Academic Integrity Statement | Please review the USQ policy for Academic Integrity (https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/13752PL). Turnitin has been enabled so that students can check for similarity matching within their assessment and make amendments prior to the due date to demonstrate academic integrity. |
Late Submissions | The penalty for late submission without a pre-approved extension is a reduction by 5% of the maximum Mark applicable for the Assignment, for each University Business Day or part Business Day that the Assignment is late (https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/14749PL). |
Appendix A
SPECIFIC | Ensure the goal is specific to the problem. Get the person to start with my goal is to ‘…’. This will make it specific. Ensure it is unambiguous. Describe goals in simple terms. What do they want to achieve? How will they achieve it? And when will they achieve it? |
MEASURABLE | The person needs to be able to determine if they have reached their goal. Write down how it will be measured if they reach their goal. You can also add in a starting point. If the goal is measurable the person will be able to celebrate when they reach their milestone. |
ACHIEVABLE | The person needs to be able to think they CAN do this. Ask the following questions: What skills do you need to achieve this? What information and knowledge do you need? What help, assistance or collaboration do you need? What resources do you need? What barriers may block progress? Are you making any assumptions? Is there a better way of doing things? What steps do you need to accomplish your goal? |
REALISTIC | The person must be able to expect to attain the goal. Don’t allow them to set it too high to satisfy their friends pr family nor base their goals on someone else’s aspirations. Write down ‘I want to accomplish this goal because…’ . Is this reasonable? This will keep them motivated. |
TIME FRAMED | The person must have a time frame to achieve their goal. This helps them stay focused and minimises procastination. How long will it take to finish each step in the plan? |
SMART goal examples
Specific | Measurable | Achievable | Realistic | Timely |
Decrease coffee consumption every day by 1 coffee until cease drinking coffee in 1 week | Day 1= 7 coffees Day 2= 6 coffees Day 3= 5 coffees Day 4= 4 coffees Day 5= 3 coffees Day 6= 2 coffees Day 7= 1 coffee | This is an achievable goal as it does not require instant cessation and is supported using alternative beverages such as water and tea | Yes there are no known additional stressors such as work etc at this time so it is realistic to achieve | It is will be reviewed daily and continue for week |
Increase cardiovascular exercise by skipping rope for 30 minutes every 2nd day. Starting at 5 mins and increasing by 5 mins/day over 1 week | Day 1= 5 mins Day 3= 10 mins Day 5= 15 mins Day 7=20 mins Scheduled for after work and recorded on the exercise app | There are no physical limitations to skipping rope. There is a rope available and an area with enough room | Yes, it is something that is an enjoyable activity | Review progress every 2nd day until 1 week and if no issues continue for 2 weeks then review |
NUR2102 Written Assignment – Criteria Marking Guide | ||||||
Objectives Part A | 12.5-10.7 | 10.6 -9.4 | 9.3 -8.2 | 8.1-6.25 | 6.24-0 | MARK |
Question 1. Identification and explanation Collect cues and recall knowledge | Comprehensive identification of the relevant patient cues/information noted in the patient case study | Extensive identification of the relevant patient cues/information noted in the patient case study with only minor omissions and minor issues with relevance to his situation. | Identifies most of the patient cues/information noted in the patient case study but some of these are not relevant to his situation | Identifies some of the patient cues/information noted in the patient case study There needed to be stronger relevance to his situation in the identification. | Limited or no identification patient cues/information noted in the patient case study Unclear and illogical explanation as to how these cues/information relate to Asthma pathophysiology. The discussion is unsupported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | /12.5 |
Provides clear and logical explanation as to how these cues/information relate to Asthma pathophysiology. | Provides mostly clear and logical explanation as to how these cues/information relate Asthma pathophysiology with only some issues with relevance | Provides an explanation as to how these cues/information relate to Asthma pathophysiology but this could have been made clearer, showing stronger links between the cues and the knowledge | Provides a basic explanation as to how these cues/information relate to Asthma pathophysiology but these links often lacked relevance to his situation | |||
The discussion is comprehensively supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The discussion is extensively supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The discussion is mostly supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The discussion is supported by some contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice |
Question 2. | 12.5-10.7 | 10.6 -9.4 | 9.3 -8.2 | 8.1-6.25 | 6.24-0 | |
Analysis Process information | Comprehensive analysis of the subjective and objective data that provides an accurate interpretation of the case study patients’ overall health status | Extensive analysis of the subjective and objective data that provides an accurate interpretation of the case study patients’ overall health status | Broad analysis of the subjective and objective data that provides a mostly accurate interpretation of the case study patients’ overall health status | Basic analysis of the subjective and objective data that provides an interpretation of the case study patients’ overall health status with some accuracy | Limited or no analysis of the subjective and objective data that provides an inaccurate interpretation of the case study patients’ overall health status | /12.5 |
The analysis and interpretation is comprehensively supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The analysis and interpretation is extensively supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The analysis and interpretation is mostly supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The analysis and interpretation is supported by some contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The analysis and interpretation is unsupported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | ||
Part B | 10-8.5 | 8.4-7.5 | 7.4-6.5 | 6.4-5 | 5-0 | |
Question 1. Identification and explanation Clinical problems | The discussion contains an excellent overview of the identified problems/issues for the patient. Provides a clear and logical rationale. | The discussion contains a good overview of the identified problems/issues for the patient. Provides a mostly clear and logical rationale. | The discussion contains a moderately sound overview of the identified problems/issues for the patient. Provides some logical rationale. | The discussion contains a minimal overview of the identified problems/issues for the patient. Provides basic rationales. | The discussion contains no identification of the identified problems/issues for the patient. Provides unclear and illogical rationales. | |
All identified problems are supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | Identified problems are extensively supported by relevant contemporary, evidence- based practice. | Identified problems are mostly supported by evidence-based practice. | There is some support for the Identified problems with evidence-based practice. | Unsupported with evidence or evidence is irrelevant, old or questionable in terms of scholarly merit | /10 | |
1 |
Question 2 | 10-8.5 | 8.4-7.5 | 7.4-6.5 | 6.4-5 | 5-0 | |
Application Apply SMART goals (Specific, Measureable, Actions, Realistic and Timely) | Comprehensive demonstration of goal setting applying all of the SMART elements accurately. Provides strong links to the problem/issues for the patient | Mostly clear demonstration of goal setting applying most of the SMART elements mostly accurately. Provides mostly strong links to the problem/issues for the patient | Sound demonstration of goal setting applying some of the SMART elements with a sound degree of accuracy. Provides sound links to the problem/issues for the patient | Basic demonstration of goal setting. Smart elements applied basically Provides basic links to the problem/issues for the patient | Limited or no demonstration of goal setting applying the SMART elements. Provides unclear or illogical links to the problem/issues for the patient | /10 |
Question 3 | 10-8.5 | 8.4-7.5 | 7.4-6.5 | 6.4-5 | 5-0 | |
Identification and explanation Nursing intervention | The discussion contains excellent overview of the relevant nursing interventions that are required for the patient. Provides a clear and logical rationale for the interventions. | The discussion contains a good overview of the relevant nursing interventions that are required for the patient. Provides a mostly clear and logical rationale for the interventions. | The discussion contains a moderately sound overview of the relevant nursing interventions that are required for the patient. Provides some logical rationale for the interventions. | The discussion contains a minimal overview of the relevant nursing interventions that are required for the patient. Provides basic rationales for the interventions. | The discussion contains no identification of the nursing interventions that are required for the patient. Provides unclear and illogical rationales for the interventions | /10 |
All interventions are supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | Interventions are extensively supported by relevant contemporary, evidence- based practice. | Most Interventions are supported by evidence based practice. | There is some support for the interventions with evidence-based practice | Unsupported with evidence or evidence is irrelevant, old or questionable in terms of scholarly merit | ||
Question 4 | 10-8.5 | 8.4-7.5 | 7.4-6.5 | 6.4-5 | 5-0 | |
Explanation Evaluate | Comprehensive description of the appropriate strategies used to evaluate the outcomes of the chosen nursing interventions. All identified strategies are appropriate for evaluating the outcomes of the chosen interventions and for ensuring that they have been effective. | Extensive description of the appropriate strategies used to evaluate the outcomes of the chosen nursing interventions. The identified strategies are mostly appropriate for evaluating the outcomes of the chosen interventions and for ensuring that they have been effective. | Broad explanation of the appropriate strategies to evaluate the chosen nursing interventions Some of the identified strategies are appropriate for evaluating the outcomes of the chosen interventions and for ensuring that they have been effective. | Basic explanation of the appropriate strategies used to evaluate the outcomes of the chosen nursing interventions A few identified strategies are appropriate for evaluating the outcomes of the chosen interventions and for ensuring that they have been effective. | Limited or no explanation of the appropriate strategies used to evaluate the outcomes of the chosen nursing interventions Limited or nil identified strategies are appropriate for evaluating the outcomes of the chosen interventions and for ensuring that they have been effective. | /10 |
1 |
Part C | 25-21.5 | 21.25-18.8 | 18.75-16.6 | 16.5-12.5 | 12.5-0 | |
Reflect on process Critically discuss | A well-structured logical and critical discussion of the nurse’s role in facilitating self-efficacy and self-management. | A mostly well-structured discussion of the nurse’s role in facilitating self- efficacy and self- management. | A satisfactory discussion of the nurse’s role in facilitating self-efficacy and self-management. | A basic discussion of the nurse’s role in facilitating self-efficacy and self- management. | Limited or no discussion of the nurse’s role in facilitating self-efficacy and self-management. | |
All elements of the discussion are supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice. | Most elements of the discussion are supported by relevant contemporary, evidence- based practice. | Elements of the discussion are supported by some evidence based practice. | There is some support for the discussion with evidence-based practice. | Unsupported with evidence or evidence is irrelevant, old or questionable in terms of scholarly merit. | /25 | |
5 | 4 | 3 | 2.5 | <2.5 | ||
Structure Academic writing style | Strong construction of paragraphs and points with each succinctly discussing a distinct issue. | Effective construction of paragraphs with each discussing a distinct point. | Construction of paragraphs that aids the flow of the paper. | Basic paragraph construction. Many (>4) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors Adheres to prescribed word limit length +/- 10%. | Poor paragraph construction. Several (>6) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors. Prescribed word limit not adhered to | |
No critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors. | Minimal (1-2) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors. | Few (2-3) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors. | /5 | |||
Adheres to prescribed word limit length +/- 10% | Adheres to prescribed word limit length +/- 10% | Adheres to prescribed word limit length +/- 10%. | ||||
Criteria 8 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2.5 | <2.5 | MARK |
Referencing Use and integration of evidence | The discussion is comprehensively supported by contemporary, relevant evidence- based practice | The discussion is extensively supported by relevant contemporary, evidence- based practice. APA referencing is used in text and in the reference list with minimal errors. | The discussion is mostly supported with highly relevant contemporary, evidence- based practice APA referencing is used in text and in the reference list with several errors. | Reference to literature within the discussion is present but not strong | Reference to literature within the discussion, if any, is not appropriate or insufficient APA referencing style has not been used or it has been used but incorrectly in both in-text citations and reference list. | |
/5 | ||||||
Use of APA referencing (6th or 7th edition) for in- text citations and reference list | APA referencing is used correctly in text and in the reference list. | APA referencing is used in text and in the reference list but there are multiple errors. | ||||
1 |
MARKS LOST FOR LATE PENALTY (IF RELEVANT -5% of the total marks available for the assessment item per working day deducted from total mark gained) | |
Markers comments Markers Name; Date: Moderators name | /100 |
[ANSWER PREVIEW]
From the data provided normal signs and symptoms include audible wheeze and decreased air entry, productive cough, difficulty breathing, oxygen saturation (92%), and chest tightness. The inflammation connected with the pathophysiology of asthma is directly linked to these signs and symptoms. However, some can indicate other common respiratory conditions like bronchitis, characterised by cough and difficulty in breathing. The weight, height and BMI equally seem to be in the normal range for an adult of Mr. Smith’s age. Abnormal signs and symptoms may be decreased air entry, RR (32), HR (110), accessory muscle use, and talking in short sentences. These elements point to severe asthma, if not a different chronic malady. Kostakou et al. (2019) state that, among other features, severe asthma is characterised by a patient talking in words instead of full coherent sentences, utilising their accessory muscles, a RR of > 30 breaths per minute, a HR ≥ 110 beats per minute, and oxygen saturation of less than 90%. In addition, Mr. Smith does not have a current asthma action plan and his puffer does not help. Overall, Mr. Smith’s asthmatic status is deteriorating fast. He has a few normal symptoms, with vital signs showing that his condition is inching towards a severe case….[Buy Full Answer for Just USD 9: 2425 WORDS]
[SOLUTION DESCRIPTION]
Type: Essay
Word Count: 2425
Grade/Mark: 85 (Distinction)