[ANSWER]PYB309 Assessment Item No. 1 Case Study – An Assessment Regime for Mark: Social Learning Theory vs. the Psychodynamic Approach

[ANSWER PREVIEW]

Social learning vs the Psychodynamic

To assess Marks’ alcohol dependence, gambling addiction and relationship functioning, the following tools are deemed the most appropriate: the Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (for alcohol dependence), the Problem Gambling Severity Index (for gambling addition), and the Relationship Assessment Scale (for relationship functioning). In their respective fields, these tools are among the commonly used and the most empirically validated, hence their inclusion in Mark’s assessment regime.

The Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (SADQ), a 20-item tool that measures the extent to which an individual is dependent on alcohol, has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing this variable. A study involving three samples of problematic alcohol users drawn from the American context found the SADQ had high test-retest reliability and high construct validity (Stockwell, Murphy & Hodgson, 1983). In a different setting (India), a study that involved a sample of 70 patients attending an alcohol rehabilitation centre reported sufficient internal, criterion, and external validity for the SADQ (Abraham & Chandrasekaran, 1997).

More recent studies have also demonstrated the reliability and validity of the SADQ in measuring alcohol dependence. For example, Akyel, Aldemir and Altintoprak’s (2018) study of 200 individuals diagnosed with an alcohol use disorder in the Turkish context found that the SADQ had Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability scores of 0.914 and 0.885, respectively. Clearly, the SADQ is a reliable and valid tool for measuring alcohol dependence; using it would be helpful in assessing, among other aspects, Mark’s withdrawal symptoms and craving for alcohol. Social learning vs the Psychodynamic

The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) is a 9-item scale that measures the extent to which an individual is addicted to gambling. Currie, Hodgins and Casey (2013) examined the validity and reliability of the tool using a nationally representative sample of more than 25,000 Canadian gamblers in various risk categories (non-problematic, low-risk, moderate-risk and problematic gamblers) and found strong evidence for validity and reliability as measured by temporal stability and discriminant validity. In the Japanese context, Social learning vs the Psychodynamic So et al. (2019) recorded high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89), moderate test-retest retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.54), and sufficient…[Buy Full Answer for Just USD 9: 3472 WORDS]

[SOLUTION DESCRIPTION]

Social learning vs the Psychodynamic

Type: Essay

Word Count: 3472

Grade/Mark: 88 (Distinction)

GradedSolution