[ANSWER]CAPS 4360A Moral Issues In Society Paper 3: Should Voluntary-Active Euthanasia be Legalize?

TASK DESCRIPTION

Moral Issues In Society

Moral Issues In Society

1. Evaluate the one best argument, described in Paper 3 [Moral Issues In Society], in favor of the proponent position. How well does the argument supports the position? Explain.
2. Evaluate one best argument, described in Paper 3, in favor of the opponent position. How well does the argument supports the position? Explain.
3. Present your own answer to your should-question. Make a policy proposal.


4. Develop an argument in support of your view. Note how your argument improves on or succeeds over the proponent and opponent arguments evaluated earlier in the paper. Utilize material from three new scholarly sources (that is, scholarly sources you have not already used in previous papers for the course).
5. Perform Ruggiero Analysis of your own view and argument, including your policy proposal, to identify inherent values, obligations, consequences, and assumptions. Spell out what each value and obligation means to you. Note how values, obligations, and so on are relatively weighted. Include thoughtful
discussion. Avoid dry ? laundry lists? of values, obligations, consequences, and assumptions.


6. Compare what you learned through Ruggiero Analysis of your position with what
you found in performing Ruggiero Analysis on the proponent and opponent positions. Provide engaging discussion. Avoid dry, point-for-point comparisons. 
7. Include a ?Works Cited? page in MLA format with at least three new scholarly sources (that is, scholarly sources you have not already used in previous papers for the course)
8. Be 4-6 pages long, not including the ?Works Cited? page.
9. Adhere to ?Format for Written Assignments.?
Note also that Paper 5 does not require an intro or conclusion and it is recommended that you not include them. 


Argument Evaluation
There is no one right way to evaluate arguments. The kind of evaluation which is appropriate may vary based on the nature of the argument being evaluated. With that in mind, use your best judgment. Optionally, consider the following questions. You need not answer them in your paper at all. They are meant as suggested prompts only.


Answering them all will not necessarily guarantee you have produced an effective analysis. [Moral Issues In Society]
1. How does each argument function?
2. Is the argument logically sound or has some flaw in reasoning been committed?
3. If assumptions implicit in the argument are rejected, is the argument still convincing?
4. Will the argument only be convincing to a reader who shares certain values with those making the argument?


5. Are the obligations important to those making the argument really obligatory, and does their position represent the only way these obligations can be met?
6. Are consequences of the view being argued for desirable?
7. Do we have a moral imperative to bring about the consequences of the view being argued for, and if so, is the view being argued for the only way to bring about these consequences?

[ANSWER PREVIEW]

The concepts of autonomy and dignity are one of euthanasia proponent main arguments. Individual autonomy is the notion that “to live one’s life according to reasons and motives that are taken as one’s own and not the product of manipulative or distorting external forces” (Sjöstrand).

This concept [Moral Issues In Society] strongly supports the legalization of active voluntary euthanasia because for a patient who is a rational individual they should have the right and the capability to decide when to end their life to eliminate suffering. Currently passive euthanasia is legal within all the state because people believe it is morally right to refuse treatment and let a patient die since there was no direct action involve.

It is not morally right to legalize active euthanasia because there is action from the doctors that cause the patient to die. This idea is misguided according to Doyal. He stated that by doing nothing . Doyal argue that in passive euthanasia by doing nothing the doctor actually doing something. He is letting the patient die and this constitutes an action…[Buy Full Answer for Just USD 9: 1741 WORDS]

[SOLUTION DESCRIPTION]

Type: Essay

Word Count: 1741

Grade/Mark: 88 (Distinction)

GradedSolution