[ANSWER]Assessment 2: Making Sense of Evidence

Making Sense of Evidence: Adult patients admitted to two ICU units in the selected site were recruited to participate in the study. One of the ICU units specifically cared for post-cardiothoracic surgical patients, while the other one specialised in critically ill medical-surgical patients. Patients excluded from the study were minors (below 18 years), those with an issue that made it difficult to apply the wearable sensor (e.g., sensitivity to adhesion or a sternal dressing), and those who had extreme levels of frailty or acuity in accordance with clinician determination. Patients who refused to participate in the study were also excluded.

To limit bias in participant selection, the researchers employed randomisation. They achieved concealment by using opaque envelopes. Permutation was performed to determine…[Buy Full Answer for Just USD 9: 1205 WORDS]

[Making Sense of Evidence: SOLUTION DESCRIPTION]

Type: Essay

Word Count: 1205

Grade/Mark: 89 (Distinction)

Go Home…