[ANSWER]NURBN3021 Assessment Task 3 – Caring for Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders: Critical Nursing Practice Considerations
TASK DESCRIPTION ON CRITICAL NURSING PRACTICE
Weighting: 40%
Due date: Wednesday Oct 7th 12pm ALL Students
Purpose: Develop a critical nursing practice plan using the Registered Nurse Standards for strategies in managing the health issues that impact those of a chosen diverse population in the local, national, or global community of Australia.
Word Count: Between 2200-2500 words in length
Format:
You are required to use headings to structure your report. Do not include a defined Introduction
or Concluding paragraphs. The Report will be presented as a formal academic paper and conform to the Federation University, School of Health, Student Academic Handbook (Higher Education). Academic writing should be formatted according to the Federation University, General Guide to Writing and Study Skills.
Description:
In this assignment students are required to:
Choose one diverse population of your choice based on the populations outlined in the course content, that is: children, older persons, men, women, minority groups, culturally and linguistically diverse persons, and those with a physical or mental disability.
Then present a report discussing the key areas to follow. You will also propose a critical nursing practice plan that seeks to address one of the health outcomes you have discovered for this group.
Within your assignment you need to begin with:
- WHY your chosen population is considered diverse and include:
- Social determinants of health and how they impact this population;
- Health inequalities (the differences in health status between population groups) such as differences in wellbeing, risk of disease, abuse/violence, healthy life expectancy, morbidity and mortality;
- Health inequities (differences in health status between population groups that are socially produced, systematic in their unequal distribution across the population, avoidable and unfair) such as difference in access, affordability, income etc;
- Health outcomes – Discuss key health issues impacting this population ie certain disease, mental health issues, injuries etc (Approx.1200 words)
- Discuss the critical nursing practice care considerations that would be important in caring for an individual of this population. Your discussion should highlight and link to three Registered Nurse Standards such as:
- Standard 2: Engaging in a therapeutic and professional relationship
- How to communicate effectively, and how to be respectful of your chosen population’s dignity, culture, values, beliefs and rights.
- How to provide support and direct your chosen population to resources to optimise their health-related decisions (Approx.1200 words)
- Standard 2: Engaging in a therapeutic and professional relationship
Referencing:
Referencing should be included using APA 7th Edition guidelines. Review the FedCite Resource page. It is expected that the students use peer reviewed sources for referencing. For this assessment and to support your findings, you are to use at least 15 peer-reviewed references in your paper. You may use and add to the references used in Assessment Task 1- E-Poster.[Critical Nursing Practice]
Submission:
Turnitin software will be used in this course for Assessment Task 3 to assist students with their academic writing and to verify the originality of assessment tasks. It will be used to assess and give feedback. FAILURE TO SUBMIT WORK THROUGH TURNITIN FOR THESE TASKS WILL RESULT IN A ZERO GRADE for this assessment. Please ensure you only use the link provided with the assessment task.
If you have any issues with your submissions through the Turnitin Link provided on Moodle, you need to make contact with the Information Technology Service Desk (ph: 5327 9999) to resolve the problem. If the problem cannot be resolved prior to the due date, you must email the Course Coordinator immediately. Please note that you should always attempt to complete and submit your assignment as early as possible to avoid any potential problems.[Critical Nursing Practice]
Marking:
University staff will mark this assessment task. Pre-marking moderation will apply to this assessment task. A marking guide for this assessment task is included on page 4. [Critical Nursing Practice]
Feedback:
Results and feedback for this assessment task will be released within 3-4 weeks as per Federation University policy.
NURBN3021 Assessment Task 4 Report
| High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Marginal | Unsatisfactory |
Introduction to the diverse population | Excellent description of the diverse group. All key social determinants identified and comprehensive discussion of their i m pa c t. (10 marks) | Good description of the diverse group. Most social determinants identified and good discussion of their impact. (8 marks) | Minimal description of the diverse group. Most social determinants identified and some discussion of their impact. (6 marks) | Unclear description of the diverse group. Some social determinants identified though poor discussion of their impact. (4 marks) | A brief description of the diverse group. Minimal or incorrect social determinants discussed and minimal or incorrect discussion of their impact. (2 marks) | Diverse population not introduced or discussed. (0 marks) |
Health intelligence & inequities | Excellent discussion of inequalities and inequities. Comprehensive discussion of their impact. (20 marks) | Good discussion of inequalities and inequities. Good discussion of their impact. (16 marks) | Minimal or irrelevant discussion of inequalities and inequities. Unclear discussion of their impact. (12 marks) | Unclear discussion of inequalities and inequities. Unclear/irrelevant discussion of their impact. (8 marks) | Unclear discussion of inequalities and inequities. No or poor discussion of their impact. (4 marks) | No relevant health inequalities or inequities discussed (0 marks) |
Health outcomes | Excellent discussion of health outcomes. Comprehensive discussion of their impact on the population. (10 marks) | Good discussion of health outcomes. Good discussion of their impact on the population. (8 marks) | Minimal or irrelevant discussion of health outcomes. Unclear discussion of their impact on the population. (6marks) | Unclear discussion of health outcomes. Unclear/irrelevant discussion of their impact on the population. (4 marks) | Unclear discussion of health outcomes. No or poor discussion of their impact on the population. ( 2 marks) | No relevant health outcomes discussed (0 marks) |
First chosen Standard | Excellent discussion of the application of first Standard. Comprehensive discussion of their population. (10 marks) | Good discussion of the application of first Standard. Good discussion of their impact on the population. (8 marks) | Minimal or irrelevant discussion of the application of first Standard. Unclear discussion of their impact on the population. (6marks) | Unclear discussion of the application of first Standard. Unclear/irrelevant discussion of their impact on the population. (4 marks) | Unclear discussion of the application of first Standard. None or poor discussion of their impact on the population. ( 2 marks) | No relevant discussion of the application of first Standard discussed (0 marks) |
Second chosen standard | Excellent discussion of the application of second Standard. Comprehensive discussion of their population. (10 marks) | Good discussion of the application of second Standard. Good discussion of their impact on the population. (8 marks) | Minimal or irrelevant discussion of the application of second Standard. Unclear discussion of their impact on the population. (6marks) | Unclear discussion of the application of the second Standard. Unclear/irrelevant discussion of their impact on the population. (4 marks) | Unclear discussion of the application of the second Standard. None or poor discussion of their impact on the population. ( 2 marks) | No relevant discussion of the application of the second Standard discussed (0 marks) |
Third chosen standard | Excellent discussion of the application of the third standard. Comprehensive discussion of its impact on the population. (10 marks) | Good discussion of the application of the third Standard. Good discussion of its impact on the population. (8 marks) | Minimal or irrelevant discussion of the application of the third Standard. Unclear discussion of its impact on the population. (6 marks) | Unclear discussion of the application of the third Standard. Unclear/irrelevant discussion of its impact on the population. (4 marks) | Unclear discussion of the application of the third Standard. None or poor discussion of its impact on the population. ( 2 marks) | No relevant discussion of the application of the third Standard discussed (0 marks) |
Referencing | APA style correctly used, no errors. Excellent recent (5-7 years old) and relevant sources used that demonstrated excellent depth of reading. Minimum of 15-20 peer reviewed sources. (5 marks) | APA style correctly used. Recent (5-7 years old) and relevant sources used that demonstrate good depth of reading. Minimum of 12-15 peer reviewed sources. (4 marks) | APA style not correctly applied with minor mistakes. Recent (5-7 years old) and relevant sources used that demonstrate reasonable depth of reading though minimum of 10-12 peer reviewed sources. (3 marks) | APA style not correctly applied with minor mistakes with referencing AND/OR < 10 recent (5-7 years old) or relevant sources (2 marks) | APA style not correctly applied with major mistakes with referencing AND < 7 recent (5-7 years old) or relevant sources (1 mark) | No in text referencing AND/OR reference list in APA style provided. (0 marks) |
Presentation/writing | Excellent layout. Writing is concise and thorough. No spelling or grammatical errors. (5 marks) | Good layout. Writing is concise and thorough. No spelling or grammatical errors. (4 marks) | Clear layout. Writing may be concise but lacks clarity. Few minor spelling or grammatical errors. (3 marks) | Unclear layout. Writing is not concise or thorough. Few minor spelling or grammatical errors. (2 marks) | Unclear layout. Writing is not concise or thorough. Many major spelling or grammatical errors. (1 marks) | Writing cannot be followed. Poor or absent use of spelling and grammar checks (0 marks) |
[ANSWER PREVIEW][Critical Nursing Practice]
The key social determinants of health for ATSIs include experiences of racism, employment status, housing and homelessness, connectedness to culture, poverty, education, and social relationships (Southgate Institute for Health, Society & Equity, 2019). Racism towards ATSIs was not just pervasive during the colonial period, but continues to prevail in today’s Australian society (Markwick et al., 2019; Waterworth et al., 2015).
Trauma resulting from these experiences has been particularly damning on the mental and physical wellbeing of the population (Waterworth et al., 2015). Evidence further shows that the experience of racism has obscured consideration of proper health behaviour and, instead, created a necessity for individual (sometimes unconventional) coping strategies (Waterworth et al., 2015). The interpersonal and systemic racism that the population
continues to face today has lowered their socioeconomic status and, therefore, their ability to afford proper healthcare services (Markwick et al., 2019). It has also caused serious institutional distrust, which has led to reluctance or failure to seek mainstream health services and late reporting of health issues (Markwick et al., 2015). Poor quality housing and homelessness have been linked to both ill physical and mental health (Baker et al., 2016). While it could be expected that ATSI populations living in…[Buy Full Answer for Just USD 9: 3367 WORDS] [Critical Nursing Practice]
[SOLUTION DESCRIPTION][Critical Nursing Practice]
Type: Essay
Word Count: 3367[Critical Nursing Practice]
Grade/Mark: 90 (Distinction)
GradedSolution[Critical Nursing Practice]