[ANSWER]UMH207 Assessment 3 Report: Critical Evaluation of a Mental Health Case

[ANSWER PREVIEW]

Critical Evaluation of Mental Health

The mental health act is the principal framework for protecting the rights of mental health patients. The legislation provides answers to the various legal and ethical issues that may arise in the course of caring for these patients. A key legal/ethical issue in Jason’s case relates to informed consent. In accordance with mental health law and healthcare ethical principles, every patient has a right to informed consent (Bipeta, 2019; RANZCP, 2017).

This means seeking to know and upholding the wishes and preferences of the patient at every stage of the care process. Jason’s case presents an ethical dilemma as he not only has been admitted involuntarily, but also refuses to take his oral antipsychotic medication tablets as well as the intramuscular depot antipsychotic medication he has been prescribed. Luckily, mental health legislation stipulates the exceptional circumstances in which informed consent considerations can be overrode (RANZCP, 2017). Critical Evaluation of Mental Health

This provision informs the clinical team’s decision to administer the depot antipsychotic medication to Jason against his will. In addition to the right to informed consent, Jason is entitled to information about his condition, respect and dignity, privacy, justice, and self-determination Critical Evaluation of a Mental Health Case (Bipeta, 2019). In terms of self-determination, for example, Critical Evaluation of Mental Health he patient prefers to be home; therefore, even though he has been admitted involuntarily, the psychiatrist should priorities this wish once his mental state stabilises.   The mental health nurse caring for Jason has an instrumental role in advocating for his rights. Given the vulnerability – socially, ethically…[Buy Full Answer for Just USD 9: 2415 WORDS]

[SOLUTION DESCRIPTION]

Type: Essay

Word Count: 2415

Grade/Mark: 88 (Distinction)

GradedSolution