[ANSWER]COUN 6261 1 Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: Discipline of Counselling
TASK DESCRIPTION
UNIT DESCRIPTION of Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
This unit provides an opportunity for students to develop and apply a practical, evidence-based, contemporary psychodynamic approach to psychotherapy. The focus of this unit is Psychodynamic- Interpersonal Therapy which is also known as The Conversational Model. With experiential skills practice forming a core component of the unit, students learn to apply Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy.
Throughout this process students, will engage with key, fundamental principles of the psychodynamic approach that will enable them to integrate elements of theory and practice from the broader field in general, and the Australian approach to Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy /The Conversational Model in particular.
ACAP classes are an open space for the critical and civil exchange of ideas, and this Unit will include topics that may be difficult for you to confront or discuss. If you feel uncomfortable discussing certain content during class, please seek the support of your educator or fellow students in the first instance. Additional free and confidential counselling support is available on all ACAP campuses.
Please visit https:/ www.acap.edu.au/current-students/services-and-support/counselling-support/ for further information on the ACAP Counselling Support Service and external supports including Lifeline, Beyond Blue, MensLine, and others.
UNIT INFORMATION
Unit Level and type | Level 600, (2nd Year) Elective |
Credit point value | 6 (out of a total of 96) |
Prerequisites | Completion of all first year units |
Co-requisites | Nil |
Equivalent Units | Nil |
Delivery modes | Blended |
Course | Master of Counselling and Psychotherapy |
DEVELOPMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AND GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:
- Critically review, interpret, integrate, and synthesise Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy to psychotherapy.
- Exercise adaptability and judgment when applying Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy
- Critically apply self-awareness and self-reflexivity when engaging with engage with key, fundamental principles of the psychodynamic approach.
- Effectively demonstrate professional knowledge and integrated understanding to communicate ideas at an advanced academic level, using contemporary communication approaches.
- Demonstrate knowledge of the therapeutic effectiveness and limitations of the psychotherapy models presented, with reference to contemporary research findings
ACAP Graduate Attributes
Successful completion of this unit also contributes specifically to the development of the following ACAP Graduate Attributes:
- GA1 COMMUNICATE: Apply effective communication skills with others in diverse contexts and through multiple modalities
- GA2 SUSTAIN: Sustain an intentional commitment to maintain currency and further develop knowledge and skills over their lifetime
- GA3 THINK: Apply critical, creative and flexible thinking to contribute and respond constructively across diverse settings
- GA4 ENGAGE: Engage effectively with contemporary and traditional knowledges across multiple contexts
- GA5 WELLBEING: Utilise skills and knowhow to maintain resilience, personal and professional wellbeing when responding to challenges and opportunities
- GA6 EQUALITY: Enact inclusive practices that deliver social justice and equality of opportunity
- GA7 INTEGRITY: Apply integrity and ethical standards to study, research and practice
- GA8 COMMUNITY: Use teamwork and leadership knowledge and skills to advance teams, groups and communities
- GA9 GLOBAL: Apply culturally sensitive professional knowledge and skills to contribute to a sustainable global future
LEARNING EXPECTATIONS
This unit has been designed to help maximise your learning and integrate it with knowledge and skills developed in earlier and later units in your course, so that you will have mastered all of the necessary learning outcomes and graduate attributes. You will need to be active in your approach to learning, completing the set learning activities before class, participating during class and consolidating what you have learned afterwards.
This means that as well as the time spent learning in class, you will need to put aside additional time each week for independent learning. The Student Code of Conduct outlines our expectations of behaviour and is designed to align with the professional expectations of students graduating from our courses.
Content of units may be personally challenging at times for yourself or others, and we encourage you to reflect on how we can all support each other to achieve our learning goals. The workload may include regular weekly learning experiences, tasks, attending classes (face-to-face / online), online activities, completing readings, hurdle task activities, researching module topics, and completing prescribed assessment tasks.
Students will be required to be proactive and self-directed in their learning, sourcing information as required, especially from the sources available through the Moodle class space. The Student Participation and Attendance Policy outlines our expectations and ensures international students maintain conditions of their study visa.
To assist you to plan for study in this trimester, follow the link to the ACAP key dates https:/ www.acap.edu.au/student-resources/key-dates/
Unique student learning expectations for this unit
Attendance requirements are in accordance with the Student Participation and Attendance Policy and also ensure students’ participation and attendance is consistent with the conditions approved by professional and regulatory bodies.
This unit is Blended
Blended
Fortnightly 60-minute lecture to be live-streamed and recorded weeks, 1, 3, 5, (Break Week 7 / No Classes), 8, 10, 12.
Fortnightly Online scheduled 120-minute interactive tutorial weeks 2, 4, 6, (Break Week 7 / No Classes), 9, 11,
13. Fortnightly Online scheduled 120-minute consultation drop-in sessions starting weeks 1, 3, 5, Break Week / No Classes, 8, 10, 12.
Consultation drop-in sessions are organised in the same time-slot as the online interactive tutorials.
A 2-day interactive skills training workshop scheduled during the trimester. On-campus or online to be advised.
Attendance requirements are only associated with tutorials and workshop. When students enrol in this modality they are enrolling in the national lecture, the tutorials and the 2-day workshops on their local campus.
A quick guide to important assessment issues in the subject
You must meet the attendance requirements for the mode of delivery that you are studying, as detailed in this Unit Outline. Yes
Submit all assessment in the designated timeframe. Yes
Pass all assessment tasks in order to pass the unit overall. Yes
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Week | Topic | Activities and Assessments |
Introduction to Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy | ||
A Brief History of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Models | ||
3 | Three Stages of Competency | |
Initial and Intermediate Sessions | ||
5 | The Self | |
Disturbance of Self – Part 1 | ||
Break week: no classes | Assessment 1: Annotated Bibliography due | |
8 | Disturbance of Self – Part 2 | |
Transference | ||
The Goals of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy | ||
Final Sessions | Assessment 2: Psychotherapy Roleplay sessions and Critical Reflection due | |
Short-Term Dynamic Interpersonal Psychotherapy (STDIP) | ||
Supervision, Integration and Critical Reflection |
ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW
There are two types of assessment tasks in this Unit – formative assessment tasks and summative assessment tasks.
The formative assessment task is an assessment for learning that usually occurs at the beginning and during the sequence of teaching and learning. This type of task provides information on student’s progress to monitor teaching and learning outcomes.
The formative assessment is not a hurdle and is not graded, however only formative assessments submitted by the due date will receive feedback from the educator. Formative assessments submitted after the due date do not receive feedback, but there is no penalty to the grade for the linked summative assessment task.
The summative assessment tasks are the graded component of this unit. It is an assessment of learning that is used primarily at the completion of a sequence of teaching, such as at the end of each unit of work. Summative assessment task provides a comprehensive evaluation of all learning outcomes over a certain period.
Students must submit each assessment task (formative and summative) to the online class space assessment dropbox (Turnitin) in Moodle by the due date.
Students in the Discipline of Counselling need to pass both assessments to meet learning outcomes and pass the unit.
Assessment Type | Due Date | Learning Outcome | Weighing | Length |
Assessment 1: Annotated Bibliography | Week 7 Monday at 4.00 pm AEST/AEDT | a, b, c & d | 50% | 2500 words |
Assessment 2: Psychotherapy Role play sessions & Critical Reflection Analysis | Week 11 Monday at 4.00 pmAEST/AEDT | a, b, c & d | 50% | 2 x 20 minute Psychotherap y Role Play sessions & 2000 word critical- reflection |
ASSESSMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES
The Assessment Policy and Procedure located on the ACAP website is a full statement of the principles and practice which inform the design, development and implementation of assessment at ACAP. All policies are available via https:/ www.acap.edu.au/pages/policies-procedures/. Application forms such as the extension request, academic considerations and appeals against grades are available
via https:/ www.acap.edu.au/student-resources/forms-and-policies/a-z-forms-and-applications/.
Assessment Practice
Academic integrity and professional standards
Academic integrity and professional standards Plagiarism is the inclusion of another person’s work within your submission without acknowledgment or permission. Plagiarism is regarded as a form of cheating. The penalties associated with misconduct are severe, and plagiarism may result in failure or variation of grade in the Unit. All ACAP students must familiarise themselves with the Academic integrity statement and the Academic Misconduct Policy
Submitting Assessments
Assignments are submitted via the class space by the due date in the Assessment Overview. Unit educators will provide instructions and demonstration of the submission process prior to the due date for the first assessment in the unit. Students who experience technical issues when attempting to submit their assignment should contact ACAP IT Support and email their educator.
Examinations and presentations must be attended as scheduled, unless by prior arrangement via Academic Consideration in Assessment. Non-attendance at a scheduled assessment may result in a Fail grade for the assessment and may impact a student’s ability to demonstrate an assurance of learning against each learning outcome
Late Submission of assessments
Should a student without an approved extension fail to submit an assessment piece by the due date, they will attract a 5% penalty for every calendar date the assessment is submitted late. The late penalty is deducted from the total marks available for the assessment piece, not the mark awarded. For example, an assessment worth 50% will incur a late penalty of 2.5 marks per day. No assessment will be accepted after 10 calendar days from the due date unless an extension has been granted.
Extensioins
Should a student require an extension they must apply in accordance with the Official Assessment Extension Guidelines (refer to Attachment 2 of the Assessment Policy and Procedure). Some, but not all assessments may permit the use of an auto-extension facility in Moodle to apply for a one week extension. If this applies the option is available until the original due date and no supporting documentation is required. Otherwise, students apply online via the official Assessment Extension Request Form. https:/ www.acap.edu.au/student-resources/forms-and-policies/a-z-forms-and-applications/
Academic Consideration in Assessment
Students may submit an application for Academic Consideration in Assessment based on unforeseeable adverse circumstances which have impacted their ability, or one or more members of their group’s ability, to meet assessment deadlines (refer to Attachment 4 of the Assessment Policy and Procedure.
Receiving marks for assessments
Students will be notified of marks for individual assignments via the class space.
Appeals against grades
Each student has the right to appeal against an assessment decision. The student is the only person who can lodge an appeal. In the case of an assessment appeal, the student must approach the unit Academic Teacher directly first and every attempt should be made to resolve the issue at this level. If there are grounds for a more formal appeal, access the Assessment Appeal Application Form.
PRESCRIBED, RECOMMENDED AND FURTHER READINGS
The prescribed textbook for this unit is:
Barkham, M., Guthrie, E., Hardy, G.E., & Margison, F. (2017). Psychodynamic-Interpersonal therapy. A conversational model. Sage Publications.
Gabbard, G. (2017). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A basic text (3rd ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Many textbooks are available as library ebooks. Students are encouraged to check availability here: https:/ libguides.navitas.com/textbooks/etextbooks
Publisher-set limitations may apply to ebooks regarding printing of content, offline availability, or number of simultaneous users.
Additional prescribed, recommended, and further readings are made available in the online class space.
LEARNING RESOURCES AND SUPPORT
Academic and Learning Support
Students’ first point of contact for academic support is their unit educator. Contact details for the staff in this unit are available in the class space. Here students will find consultation hours for this unit and the best means for contacting individual staff.
Library
To support your learning in this unit, the Library (https:/ libguides.navitas.com/home) provides access to print and electronic books, scholarly journals, referencing guides and other resources. ACAP librarians can help you through our Library Chat service or by online appointment
(https:/ navitas.libcal.com/appointments).
user guides, IT Policies and Technical Support:
For user guides, IT policies and technical support: https:/ www.acap.edu.au/student-resources/support- services/it-student-helpdesk/.
The Student Learning Support (SLS) Service
To access the Student Learning Support, follow this link https:/ sls.navitas-professional.edu.au/. The site provides information on effective study habits and information that will assist you to structure, format and reference an assignment successfully. It also provides information on a range of workshops and tutorials to support students with study skills, academic writing and language learning. SLS Advisors offer consultations online or in person at selected on campus locations.
Personal Support
ACAP counsellors provide free confidential support and personalised assistance to help students manage their personal issues and develop strategies to concentrate on their studies. Sessions are available online or in person at selected campus locations. Find more information via https:/ www.acap.edu.au/student- resources/support-services/counselling-support/
Administrative Support
The Student Engagement team can assist with administration matters. For more
information https:/ www.acap.edu.au/student-resources/support-services/student-engagement-and- administration/.
ASSESSMENT DETAIL
Assessment 1:
Assessment Type | Annotated Bibliography |
Due Date | Week 7, Monday at 4.00pm (AEST/AEDT)* |
Learning Outcome | Critically review, interpret, integrate, and synthesise knowledge of major paradigms presented in this unit including Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy to Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.Exercise adaptability and judgment when applying Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy in particular.Critically apply self-awareness and self-reflexivity when engaging with engage with key, fundamental principles of the psychodynamic approach.Effectively demonstrate professional knowledge and integrated understanding to communicate ideas at an advanced academic level, using contemporary communication approaches. |
Weighting | 50% |
Length | 2500 words |
Assessment Details and Instructions
Purpose:
The purpose of this annotated bibliography is to analyse, compare and evaluate literature that discusses the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice.
An annotated bibliography is a list of citations to books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the annotation. The purpose of the annotation is for students to gain in-depth understandings of a topic and demonstrate their knowledge as they inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited. To complete this task, students will access evidence-based scholarly literature about the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice, and use this literature to think critically and make judgements on the topic (use a MS Word document).
Process
To complete this task, students will:
- Read, critically select, cite and annotate 10 sources relates to the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice.
- Provide a citation for each source, along with a brief descriptive and evaluative paragraph (the annotation)
- The annotation must inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy and quality of the source cited.
- Arrange the inclusions alphabetically according to the author’s last name using APA 7 formatting
- Provide a 250-word descriptive and evaluative summary synthesising all of the information from all 10 sources
- Total word count for the entire annotated bibliography is 2500 words (+ / – 10%)
- Only your annotations are included in the final word count. Citations are not included in the final word count.
- Submit your annotated bibliography (use a MS Word document), double-spaced.
- Further information on completing an annotated bibliography can be located on the ACAP Student Learning Support website: https:/ sls.navitas-professional.edu.au/annotated-bibliography
Contents of an annotated bibliography
- Provide the full bibliographic citation using APA 7 referencing Summarise the content or scope of the text
- Outline the main argument Indicate the intended audience
- Identify the research methods (if applicable)
- Identify any conclusions made by the author/s Evaluate the content of the text
- Discuss the reliability of the text
- Highlight any special features of the text that were unique or helpful (charts, graphs etc.)
- Point out in what way the text relates to the topic of: contemporary research on counselling group work and technology
- State the strengths and limitations of the text Present
- your view or reaction to the text
Submission
Students submit the Annotated Bibliography to the online class space assessment dropbox (Turnitin)
Marking Criteria
Standard
Criterion | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Did Not Achieve Learning Outcomes |
Content: Demonstrate knowledge and skills in identifying a variety of quality, relevant, authoritative, current, academic sources (books, journal articles, chapters) on the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice. 10 marks | Sophisticated demonstration of knowledge and skills in identifying a variety of quality and highly pertinent, relevant, authoritative, current, academic sources (books, journal articles, chapters) on the topic | Comprehensive demonstration of knowledge and skills in identifying a variety of quality, relevant, authoritative, current, academic sources (books, journal articles, chapters) on the topic | Effective demonstration of knowledge and skills in identifying a variety of mostly relevant, authoritative, academic sources (books, journal articles, chapters) on the topic. 7 out of 10 articles are relevant, 3 are not. | Adequate demonstration of knowledge and skills in identifying partially relevant, authoritative, academic sources (books, journal articles, chapters) on the topic. 6 out of 10 articles are relevant, 4 are not. | Unsatisfactory demonstration of knowledge and skills in identifying academic sources (books, journal articles, chapters) with limited relevance to the topic. 5 or less articles are relevant, 5 or more are not. |
Application: Demonstrate knowledge and skills in summarising each source by including the main argument, intended audience, the authors’ findings and conclusions 10 marks | Sophisticated demonstration of knowledge and skills with exemplary summarising of each source by consistently including the main argument, intended audience, findings and conclusions | Comprehensive demonstration of knowledge and skills with comprehensive summarising of each source by consistently including the main argument, intended audience, findings and conclusions | Effective demonstration of knowledge and skills in summarising each source by mostly including the main argument, findings and conclusions. At least one area requires refinement. | Adequate demonstration of knowledge and skills in summarising each source by attempting to include the main argument, findings and conclusions. At least two areas require refinement. | Unsatisfactory demonstration of knowledge and skills in summarising each source with minimal attempt to include the main argument, findings and conclusions. |
Evidence: Demonstrate knowledge and skills in evaluating the information provided within the sources, by outlining the reliability of the source, any special features, the relevance of the text to the topic and the field and identifying any strengths and limitations 10 marks | Sophisticated demonstration of knowledge and skills in critically and effectively evaluating the information provided within the sources, by consistently outlining the reliability of the source, any special features, the relevance of the text to the topic and the field, and identifying any highly pertinent strengths and limitations | Comprehensive demonstration of knowledge and skills in critically evaluating the information provided within the sources, by consistently outlining the reliability of the source, any special features, the relevance of the text to the topic and the field, and identifying any pertinent strengths and limitations | Effective demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating the information provided within the sources, by mostly outlining the reliability of the source, any special features, the relevance of the text to the topic and the field, and identifying any strengths and limitations. 1 or 2 of the articles have not been suitably evaluated. | Adequate demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating the information provided within the sources, by partially outlining the reliability of the source, any special features, the relevance of the text to the topic and the field, and attempting to identify any strengths and limitations. 3 articles have not been suitably evaluated. | Unsatisfactory demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating the information provided within the sources, with unsatisfactory or limited details of the reliability of the source, any special features, the relevance of the text to the topic and the field, and any strengths and / or limitations. 4 or more articles have not been suitably evaluated. |
Synthesis: Demonstrate knowledge and skills in synthesising all 10 sources in a 250-word summary, drawing conclusions and forming an opinion on own counselling therapy and the core competencies of contemporary psychodynami c practice. 10 marks | Sophisticated synthesis using highly pertinent critical thinking skills and exemplary demonstration of drawing own conclusions that are relevant to the field of counselling and to the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice. | Comprehensive synthesis using critical thinking skills and demonstration of drawing own conclusions that are relevant to the field of counselling and to the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice. | Effective synthesis of information and a good attempt at drawing own conclusions that are relevant to the field of counselling as it relates to field of counselling and to the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice.Tends to describe the chosen articles with only partial synthesis. | Adequate but still developing synthesis with a partial demonstration of skills in drawing own conclusions that are relevant to the field of counselling and to the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice. Largely describes the chosen articles with limited synthesis. | Unsatisfactory synthesis with limited demonstration of skills in drawing own conclusions that are relevant to the field of counselling and to the core competencies of contemporary psychodynamic practice. |
Academic literacies: 10 marks | Written and presented to an exemplary academic standard i.e., diligent command and adherence to the specified genre; the communication is clear and logical. No errors in grammar, punctuation and or spelling. No errors in APA referencing and formatting. | Written and presented to a high academic standard i.e., strong command and adherence to the specified genre; the communication is logical. Very few (<2) errors or repeated errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning is not impeded. Very few (<2) errors minor repeated errors in APA referencing and formatting. | Written and presented to a satisfactory standard i.e., mostly adheres to the specified genre with at least one minor error; the communication is mostly clear. Few errors (<4) or repeated errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning is mostly clear. Few (<4) minor repeated and unique errors in APA referencing and formatting. | Written and presented to an adequate standard i.e., there is some adherence to the specified genre although more refinement is required; the communication is adequate. Some errors or repeated errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning somewhat impeded. Some errors (>4) in APA referencing and formatting. | Written and presented to an unacceptable standard i.e., unsatisfactory adherence to the specified genre; the communication lacks logic & clarity. Considerable errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning unclear. APA referencing and formatting contain unacceptable number of errors. |
Grade: |
Feedback/Comments: |
Assessment 2
Assessment Type | Psychotherapy Role Play Sessions and Critical Analysis |
Due Date | Week 11, Monday at 4.00pm (AEST/AEDT)* |
Learning Outcome | Critically review, interpret, integrate, and synthesise Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy to psychotherapy.Exercise adaptability and judgment when applying Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Therapy.Critically apply self-awareness and self-reflexivity when engaging with engage with key, fundamental principles of the psychodynamic approach.Effectively demonstrate professional knowledge and integrated understanding to communicate ideas at an advanced academic level, using contemporary communication approaches. |
Weighting | 50% |
Length | 2 x 20 minute role play sessions and 2000 word critical analysis |
Assessment Details and Instructions
Purpose
The purpose of this assessment is for students to engage in two (2) psychotherapy role play sessions with the same client, demonstrating competence in therapeutic processes appropriate to the client’s presentation.
Students will choose a section from each role play to transcribe and will identify psychodynamic- interpersonal skills used.
Evaluating the development of psychodynamic process across the two sessions, students will both critically evaluate the effectiveness of their therapeutic skills and the integration of psychodynamic theory into their practice.
Students will demonstrate reflective practice, in which they use their observation and analytic skills to review their own actions to develop and consolidate self-knowledge.
Process
Part A – Role Play Practice Sessions
Students are required to video 2 x 20 minute counselling role play practice sessions using the zoom platform. Instructions on how to record a counselling role play session can be found
at https:/ students.acap.edu.au/assets/CurrentStudents/Managing-My-Course/A-Z-Forms/How-to-conduct- a-Practice-Counselling-Session-via-Zoom.pdf.
Students must seek informed, written consent from the client to record and submit the session for assessment. Use the Client/Interviewee Consent Form located in A-Z forms on the ACAP current student website. Please submit a copy of the signed consent form with the written evaluation of the session. Client must be 18 years or older.
Part B – Transcript
Transcribe 10 minutes from each role play and include as appendices. Label the relevant psychodynamic- interpersonal skills used.
The transcript should include counsellor and client statements using an appropriate abbreviation (e.g. CNS for counsellor, and CL for client). The suggested format below allows you to identify time and skills in the segment.
Time Marker | Transcript | Psychodynamic |
An occasional indication of time within the session (e.g. one minute, two minutes) | CNS:….. CNS:….. |
Critical Analysis
Students need to critically analyse the effectiveness of therapeutic skills and processes used across the two sessions and how these align with the stages of competence in psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy.
Students will also critically reflect on the integration of psychodynamic theory into their practice.
As a part of this analysis, students will reflect on their practice by drawing on their observation and analytic skills to evaluate their actions. This self-reflection component examines what motivated the student counsellor to practice the way they did during the session, what has been learned from this exercise in terms of the use of skills, strengths and areas requiring strengthening, and future learning goals. The evaluation is to include integration of relevant academic literature, concepts and theory
Information on how to present a critical analysis can be found at https:/ sls.navitas- professional.edu.au/critical-evaluation-or-analysis-counselling-session
Marking Criteria
Standard
Criterion | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Did Not Achieve Learning Outcomes |
Role Play: Demonstration of foundational and advanced counselling microskills throughout role play duration. 10 marks | Highly effective and consistent demonstration of foundational and advanced counselling microskills throughout duration of role play | Effective and mostly consistent demonstration of foundational and advanced counselling microskills throughout duration of role play | A clear attempt to employ foundational and advanced counselling microskills although applied somewhat inconsistently throughout duration of role play | Some employment of foundational and advanced counselling microskills although mostly applied inconsistently throughout duration of role play | Limited attempt to employ foundational and advanced counselling microskills throughout duration of role play |
Role Play: Demonstration of psychodynamic – interpersonal skills and processes across both sessions. 10 marks | Highly effective and consistent demonstration of psychodynamic – interpersonal skills and processes across both sessions. | Effective and mostly consistent demonstration of psychodynamic – interpersonal skills and processes across both sessions | A clear attempt to demonstrate some of psychodynamic – interpersonal skills and processes across both sessions | Some demonstration of psychodynamic – interpersonal skills and processes across both sessions | Limited attempt to demonstrate psychodynamic – interpersonal skills and processes. |
Critical Analysis: Evaluation of the effectiveness of therapeutic skills and processes used across the two sessions and their alignment with the stages of competence in psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy. 10 marks | Sophisticated demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic skills and processes used and their alignment with the stages of competence in in psychodynamic- interpersonal across the two sessions therapy. At least 5 highly pertinent role play examples and supported by carefully selected literature. | Comprehensive demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic skills and processes used and their alignment with the stages of competence in in psychodynamic- interpersonal therapy across the two sessions and At least 4 relevant role play examples provided and supported by relevant literature. | Effective demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic skills and processes used and their alignment with the stages of competence in psychodynamic- interpersonal therapy across the two sessions At least 3 role play examples provided and supported by mostly relevant literature. | Adequate demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic skills and processes used and their alignment with the stages of competence in psychodynamic- interpersonal therapy across the two sessions At least 2 play examples provided and supported by some relevant literature. | Unsatisfactory demonstration of knowledge and skills in evaluating effectiveness of therapeutic skills and processes used and their alignment with the stages of competence in psychodynamic- interpersonal therapy across the two sessions. Limited or no examples provided with limited to no connection made to literature. |
Critical Analysis: Reflection on the integration of psychodynamic theory into practice, including practice learnings, strengths and areas requiring strengthening and future learning goals Integration of role play examples and academic literature. 10 marks | Sophisticated and insightful reflection on the integration of psychodynamic theory into practice, including practice learnings, strengths and areas requiring strengthening and future learning goals. Sophisticated integration of pertinent role play examples (>4) and relevant literature. All elements addressed to a very high level. | Comprehensive reflection the integration of psychodynamic theory into practice, including practice learnings, strengths and areas requiring strengthening and future learning goals. Comprehensive integration of appropriate role play examples (>3) and relevant literature. All elements addressed with one requiring further refinement. | Effective reflection the integration of psychodynamic theory into practice, including practice learnings, strengths and areas requiring strengthening and future learning goals. Effective integration of appropriate role play examples (>3) and relevant literature. At least two elements require refinement. | An attempt to provide some reflection on the integration of psychodynamic theory into practice, including practice learnings, strengths and areas requiring strengthening and future learning goals. Adequate but still developing integration of some appropriate role play examples (>1) and some relevant literature. At least three elements require further refinement and rigour is lacking. | Limited to no reflection on the integration of psychodynamic theory into practice, including practice learnings, strengths and areas requiring strengthening and future learning goals. Unsatisfactory or limited integration of role play examples (<1) and relevant literature. |
Professional literacies: 10 marks | Spoken and written literacies presented at an exemplary academic standard i.e., diligent command and adherence to the specified genre; the communicatio n is clear and logical. No errors in grammar, punctuation and or spelling. No errors in APA referencing and formatting. | Spoken and written literacies presented at a high academic standard i.e., strong command and adherence to the specified genre; the communication is logical. Very few (<2) errors or repeated errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning is not impeded. Very few (<2) errors minor repeated errors in APA referencing and formatting. | Spoken and written literacies presented at a satisfactory standard i.e., mostly adheres to the specified genre with at least one minor error; the communication is mostly clear with more refinement required in either the spoken OR written component. Few errors (<4) or repeated errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning is mostly clear. Few (<4) minor repeated and unique errors in APA referencing and formatting. | Spoken and written literacies presented at an adequate standard i.e., there is some adherence to the specified genre although more refinement is required; the communication is adequate with refinement required for both spoken and written components. Some errors or repeated errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning somewhat impeded. Some errors (>4) in APA referencing and formatting. | Spoken and written literacies presented at an unacceptable standard i.e., unsatisfactory adherence to the specified genre; the communication lacks logic & clarity. Considerable errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Meaning unclear. APA referencing and formatting contain unacceptable number of errors. |
Grade: |
Feedback/Comments: |
[ANSWER PREVIEW]
On Demand: Order Customised Solution Starting from just USD 11 per page. Contact Our Support on Whatsapp Now!