![[Solution] NRS420 Health Assessment [Full Course, All Assignments and Discussions]](https://gradedsolution.com/wp-content/uploads/edd/2024/03/cropped-Graded-Solution-Logo.jpeg){kind=logo}
[ANSWER]NUR3201 Assignment Task Sheet (4) Case Study 2 – Accountability and Responsibility – Task Overview
TASK DESCRIPTION Students are to read a coronial case report and then conduct a critical analysis of key Quality and Safety concepts Accountability and Responsibility
NUR3201 Case Study 2 – Accountability and Responsibility – Task Overview
| Assessment name | Written Case Study 2 NUR3201 |
| Brief task description | Students are to read a coronial case report and then conduct a critical analysis of key Quality and Safety concepts within the case. Comprehensive details of the required task can be found in the ‘Task Information’ section of this document and the assignment marking rubric provided on the course study desk under ‘Assessments’. The case to be analyses is the Non-inquest findings into the death of Hunter, an eight year old boy Students are to use current and relevant Australian literature to support the analysis and should specifically link supporting literature to the case. With a focus on risk, the analysis should include patient assessment, recognition of deterioration and team communication provided from the Registered Nurses within their scope of practice whilst caring for SM. Accountability and Responsibility |
| Rationale for assessment task | Comprehensive assessment, documentation and communication can save lives and improve patient outcomes. This assignment will ask the student to consider their role and accountability as a Registered Nurse in this process, to prepare them for clinical practice where they will be required to work within the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/National-Safety-and- Quality-Health-Service-Standards-second-edition.pdf |
| Due Date | 2nd October 2023 by 23:59 AEST |
| Length | Word limit is 1500 words – 10% deviation allowed (word length includes in-text referencing and excludes the reference list and appendices) |
| Marks out of: Weighting: | Case study: Marks out of 70 weighting 45% |
| Course Objectives measured | CO- 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Task information
| Part 1 details | To successfully complete this assignment, you will need to complete all the following. Analysis of the Case Students are to conduct a critical analysis of the case referencing key pieces of information/examples specifically from the case and using contemporary literature to support the analysis. This focused analysis should specifically relate to the Registered Nurse’s role in identifying risk, patient assessment, recognition and escalation of deterioration and team communication within their scope of practice whilst caring for Hunter 1. The analysis should commence with a discussion from the case to highlight patient risks and missed opportunities from the perspective of a Registered Nurse with a focus on the specific and holistic care of paediatric patients and their families, advocacy, and effective communication when escalating patient care. 2. Students should include a discussion on the types of ongoing comprehensive and holistic Nursing assessments considered important when caring for Hunter. Note that in the initial stages Hunters CEWT score was zero (vital sign changes can come later in paediatric deterioration as children have good compensatory mechanisms), so you need to consider and discuss what other clinical indicators were indicative of clinical deterioration in this case. 3. The analysis of this case should use pertinent literature regarding concepts of holistic patient assessment, advocacy, human factors, and effective team communication (both written and verbal) and the implications of these on effective decision- making and care provision in the case of Hunter. 4. Students must provide a synopsis of innovative strategies that could be implemented to risk mitigate missed opportunities found in the case. These must relate to and demonstrate knowledge of the Registered Nurse’s Accountability and Responsibilityy when caring for paediatric patients. Specifically in this discussion students should consider the National Safety and Quality in Healthcare Standard – Partnering with Consumers Standard and reflect upon ‘if the health service were to work with Hunters family what strategies (other than those recommended by the QLD Coroner) could they put in place to prevent another similar incident occurring?’ Students need to demonstrate synthesis of published material within the student’s own analysis to demonstrate appropriate understanding. The analysis must be supported by relevant and contemporary literature including journal articles and relevant legislative and health policy and guideline documents. It is expected that a minimum of 8 journal articles will be used. |
| Writing Style | This assessment piece will be written in the form of an academic piece of work providing references to relevant peer reviewed articles and legislative and relevant health department policies and guidelines. Students need to demonstrate synthesis of published material with the student’s own analysis to demonstrate appropriate understanding of key safety and quality concepts within the case. Students should not to re-state the case in their work. |
| Referencing/ citations | * For this assessment, you will use APA 7th referencing style. * Sources: Students reference list must include at least 8 scholarly sources with the majority no older than 6 years old. * In text citations: Students must include intext citations in the body of work. Each new point or piece of evidence must be attributed (via in-text citation) to the source. |
| Formatting Style | Double spacing, font size 12, page numbers to be included |
| Resources available to complete task | Resources Coroners Court Queensland: Non Inquest findings into the death of Hunter https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/ data/assets/pdf_file/0009/755766/nif-hunter- 20230213.pdf Registered Nurse Standards https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/codes-guidelines-statements/professional- standards/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/National-Safety-and- Quality-Health-Service-Standards-second-edition.pdf Assignment Extension Requests Request for extensions are for extenuating circumstances only and must be at least three days prior to due date. Please see link to the USQ policy for how to request an extension Accountability and Responsibility https://www.unisq.edu.au/current-students/academic/assessments/assessment- extensions Referencing Support https://www.usq.edu.au/library/referencing Assignment Support https://www.usq.edu.au/library/study-support/assignments |
Submission information
| What you need to submit | One Microsoft Word document that contains the following items * Coversheet including unit code, unit name, semester and year, assignment title, student name, student number, word count * Do not include the marking criteria sheet |
| Submission requirements | This assessment task must: * use APA 7th referencing for citing academic literature * be submitted in electronic format as an Adobe PDF document or Microsoft Word document via Turnitin through the assignment link in the course study desk. |
| File Name Conventions | Save your document with the following naming conventions: studentnumber_NUR3201_S2_2023 A2.doc/docx/pdf |
| Moderation | All academic staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare grading decisions before marks or grades are finalised.Accountability and Responsibility |
| Academic Integrity Statement | The pursuit of scholarly activity in an open, fair, honest, respectful, and responsible manner. Academic Integrity includes a commitment not to engage in or tolerate acts of falsification, misrepresentation, or deception. Such acts of dishonesty violate the fundamental ethical principles of the University community and compromise the worth of work completed by others. Use of artificial intelligence to generate assessment text is a form of plagiarism and contract cheating and is not permitted in NUR3201, and we have in-built screening to detect the use of artificial intelligence in all submitted work. Please see links below for further information https://www.usq.edu.au/library/study-support/academic-integrity https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/13752PL Accountability and Responsibility |
[ANSWER PREVIEW]
On Demand: Order Customised Solution Starting from just USD 11 per page. Contact Our Support on Whatsapp Now!
